Friday, 9 October 2015

Research into practice: evaluation of Skills Hub content and implications for library staff development in the creation of video OERs

Research into practice: evaluation of Skills Hub content and implications for library staff development in the creation of video OERs

Jonas House, Georgina Dimmock
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14234/elehe.v7i1.89

Abstract


The University of Northampton Skills Hub is an online open-access repository of academic skills resources whose primary content is a body of short video open educational resources (OERs) created in-house by staff. To ensure OER quality and to identify staff development needs, the Skills Hub: Review, Redesign, Rebuild project was conducted. The project assessed the quality of fifty of the Skills Hub’s video OERs by inviting fifteen reviewers from different user groups to critically assess the resources. The results were analysed thematically and then considered in relation to the extant literature on the creation of multimedia educational resources and online OERs. Four main practical categories required attention in the creation of future video OERs: technical, presentation, structural and content. These four categories fed into four superordinate categories regarding cognition and reception of OERs: comprehension, concentration, information retention and professionalism. Practitioner recommendations are made for video OER producers, and the findings are situated in relation the principles of multimedia learning theory.

Keywords


OERs; Skills hub; video; staff development; library; academic skills; multimedia learning; educational psychology

Full Text:

PDF

References


Atkinson, R. K., Mayer, R. E., and Merrill, M. M. (2005) 'Fostering Social Agency in Multimedia Learning: Examining the Impact of an Animated Agent's Voice'. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30: 117-139. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2004.07.001
Davies, A., Fidler, D., Gorbis, M. (2011) Future Work Skills 2020. Institute for the Future, for the University of Phoenix Research Institute. Available at http://www.urv.cat/media/upload/arxius/CAE/oprofessional/future_work_skills_2020.pdf (accessed 12/7/14)
Flyvbjerg, B. (2004) Five Misunderstandings about Case-Study Research. In: C. Seale, G. Gobo, J. F. Gubrium and D. Silverman (eds) Qualitative Research Practice. London: Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781848608191.d33
Gerjets, P., Scheiter, K., and Catrambone, R. (2004) 'Designing Examples to Reduce Intrinsic Cognitive Load: Molar versus Modular Presentation of Solution Procedures'. Instructional Science, 32 (1-2): 33-58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:TRUC.0000021809.10236.71
Ginns, P. (2006) 'Integrating Information: A Meta-Analysis of Spatial Contiguity and Temporal Contiguity Effects'. Learning and Instruction, 16 (6): 511-525.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.10.001
Gray, D. E. (2011) Doing Research in the Real World. Second edition. London: Sage.
Hood, J. (2005) Orthodoxy vs. Power: The Defining Traits of Grounded Theory. In: A. Bryant and K. Charmaz (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Grounded Theory. London: Sage.
House, J. (2014) Skills Hub: Review. Redesign, Rebuild Research Report. LLS, University of Northampton. Available at https://skillsinnovation.files.wordpress.com/2014/06/skills-hub-report.pdf (accessed 12/7/14).
Huang, C. (2005) 'Designing High-Quality Interactive Multimedia Learning Modules'. Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics, 29 (2-3): 223-233.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compmedimag.2004.09.017
Kämpfe, J., Sedlmeier, P., and Renkewitz, F. (2010) 'The Impact of Background Music on Adult Listeners: A Meta-Analysis'. Psychology of Music, 39 (4): 424-448.http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0305735610376261
Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P., and Sweller, J. (1998) 'Levels of Expertise and Instructional Design'. Human Factors, 40 (1): 1-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1518/001872098779480587
LLS (2013) Skills Hub. LLS, University of Northampton. Available at http://skillshub.northampton.ac.uk (accessed 12/7/14).
LLS (2014) Skills Hub: Review, Redesign, Rebuild. LLS, University of Northampton. Available at http://skillsinnovation.wordpress.com (accessed 12/7/14)
Mautone, P. D, and Mayer, R. E. (2001) 'Signaling as a Cognitive Guide in Multimedia Learning'. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93 (2):.377-389.http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.93.2.377
Mayer, R. E. (2009) Multimedia Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511811678
Mayer, R. E., and Anderson, R. B. (1991) 'Animations Need Narrations: An Experimental Test of a Dual-Coding Hypothesis'. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83 (4): 484-490.http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.83.4.484
Mayer, R. E., and Anderson, R. B. (1992) 'The Instructive Animation: Helping Students Build Connections Between Words and Pictures in Multimedia Learning'. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84 (4): 444-452. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.84.4.444
Mayer, R. E., and Chandler, P. (2001) 'When Learning is Just a Click Away: Does Simple User Interaction Foster Deeper Understanding of Multimedia Messages'. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93 (2): 390-397. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.93.2.390
Mayer, R. E., Dow, G. T., and Mayer, S. (2003a) 'Multimedia Learning in an Interactive Self-Explaining Environment: What Works in the Design of Agent-Based Microworlds?' Journal of Educational Psychology, 95 (4): 806-813. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.4.806
Mayer, R. E., Sobko, K., and Mautone, P. D. (2003b) 'Social Cues in Multimedia Learning: Role of Speaker's Voice'. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95: 419-425.http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.2.419
Moreno, R., and Mayer, R. E. (1999) 'Cognitive Principles of Multimedia Learning: The Role of Modality and Contiguity'. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91 (2): 358-368.http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.91.2.358
Moreno, R., and Mayer, R. E. (2000a) 'A Coherence Effect in Multimedia Learning: The Case for Minimizing Irrelevant Sounds in the Design of Multimedia Instructional Messages'. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92 (1): 117-125. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.92.1.117
Moreno, R., and Mayer, R. E. (2000b) 'Engaging Students in Active Learning: The Case for Personalized Multimedia Messages'. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92 (4): 724-733. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.92.4.724
Moreno, R., and Mayer, R. E. (2004) 'Personalized Messages that Promote Science Learning in Virtual Environments'. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96 (1): 165-173.http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.1.165
Nass, C., and Brave, S. (2005) Wired for Speech: How Voice Activates and Advances the Human-Computer Relationship. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
Nikoi, S., and Armellini, A. (2012) 'The OER Mix in Higher Education: Purpose, Process, Product, and Policy'. Distance Education, 33 (2): 165-184.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2012.697439
Thompson, W. F., Schellenberg, E. G., and Letnic, A. K. (2012) 'Fast and Loud Background Music Disrupts Reading Comprehension'. Psychology of Music, 40 (6): 700-708.http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0305735611400173


DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14234/elehe.v7i1.89

The Journal Enhancing the Learner Experience in Higher Education can be found at: http://journals.northampton.ac.uk/index.php/elehe/index

Blended learning and postgraduate skills: rethinking MA History

Blended learning and postgraduate skills: rethinking MA History

Matthew McCormack, Natalie Hanley-Smith

Abstract


This study focuses on the implications of blended learning for taught postgraduate education. It takes as its focus the pilot year of the MA History at the University of Northampton, which had been redesigned to blend online and face-to-face delivery. By employing a student researcher to canvass students’ views, the project evaluates the implications of the delivery mode for the specific skills associated with the discipline of History. As well as evaluating this particular programme, the project uses it as a case study to develop a transferable framework for blended learning. The article argues that both online and classroom delivery can develop the key skills associated with postgraduate study in History, but in significantly different ways, so combining them in an effective blend can offer a pedagogical enhancement.

Keywords


Blended learning; e-learning; postgraduate

Full Text:

PDF

References


Butcher, J. and Maunder, R. (2014) ‘Going URB@N: exploring the impact of undergraduate students as pedagogic researchers’. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 51 (2): 142-152. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2013.771967
Campbell, V. J. and Kimball, R. A. (2010) ‘The blended history classroom: keeping the student central’. Teaching History: A Journal of Methods, 35 (2): 79-91.
Dale, C. (2006) ‘Using technologies for blended learning’. Link 17: 11-12.
Dawson, J., Murray, K., Parvis, S. and Paterson, J. (2007). Using weblogs to encourage reflective learning in History and Classics. Higher Education Academy.
Garrison, D. R. and Kanuka, H. (2004) ‘Blended learning: uncovering its transformative potential in Higher Education’. The Internet and Higher Education, 7 (2): 95-105.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.02.001
Gulc, E. (2006) ‘Using blended learning to accommodate different learning styles’. Link, 17: 17-20.
Holden, K. and Poole, S. (2010) Exploring staff and student engagement with discussion boards in the postgraduate History curriculum at UWE. https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/resource/exploring-staff-and-student-engagement-discussion-boards-post-graduate-history-programme (accessed 19/8/15).
Institute for Learning and Teaching (2014) homepage http://www.northamptonilt.com (accessed 10 October 2014).
McGee, P. and Reis, A. (2012) ‘Blended course design: a synthesis of best practices’. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 16 (4): 7-22.
McConnell, D. (2005) ‘Examining the dynamics of networked e-learning groups and communities’. Studies in Higher Education 30(1): 25-42.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0307507052000307777
Navickas, K. (2010) Case study: using a VLE discussion board with final-year history undergraduates. http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/cross_fac/heahistory/elibrary/internal/cs_navickas_vle_xxxxxxxx/ (accessed 19/8/15)
Osguthorpe, R. and Graham, C. (2003) ‘Blended learning environments: definitions and directions’. Quarterly Review of Distance Education 4 (3): 227-33.
Quality Assurance Agency (2008a) History. Gloucester: Quality Assurance Agency.
Quality Assurance Agency (2008b) The Framework for Higher Education Qualifications in England, Wales and Northern Ireland. Gloucester: Quality Assurance Agency.
Sharpe, R., Benfield, G., Roberts, G. and Francis, R. (2006) The undergraduate experience of blended e-learning: a review of UK literature and practice. The Higher Education Academy. https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/resources/detail/teachingandresearch/Undergraduate_Experience (accessed 19/8/15)
Smyth, S., Houghton, C., Cooney, A. and Casey, D. (2012) ‘Students' experience of blended learning across a range of postgraduate programmes’. Nurse Education Today 32 (4): 464-68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2011.05.014
Timmins, G. (2004) ‘History around you’: online seminars and discussions https://histsotleurope.wordpress.com/geoff-timmins-history-around-you-on-line-seminars-and-discussions (accessed 19/8/15).
Whitelaw, P. A. (2006) ‘Getting them ready for lecturers: a personal perspective’. Link 17: 22-23.


DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14234/elehe.v7i1.96


The Journal Enhancing the Learner Experience in Higher Education can be found at: http://journals.northampton.ac.uk/index.php/elehe/index

Social media platforms as educational interfaces - considering the way forward for blended learning

Social media platforms as educational interfaces - considering the way forward for blended learning

Kelly Louise Preece

Abstract


Despite their pervasiveness, Virtual Learning Environments (VLEs) are subject to a number of criticisms of their efficacy as platforms for blended learning (Weller, 2006). This paper considers the use of social media platform Padlet as an alternative educational interface through evaluation of an intervention-based case-study. Focus groups were conducted with the student cohort, identifying a number of recurring themes that form the main body of this paper: visuality and clarity of the interface, autonomy over learning, students as co-producers and critical reflection. These themes address the intervention itself, and acknowledge the limitations of the research by proposing potential developments. The paper concludes by drawing together questions for further research, and notably reflects on whether it is more pertinent to address the way we use educational interfaces, rather than the interfaces themselves, in considering ‘the way forward’ for blended learning in Higher Education 2018.

Keywords


Blended Learning; Student Experience

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bean, M. (2014) ‘Keynote’. Keynote Speech presented at the Student Education Conference 3: Engaging Leeds. (3rd. University of Leeds, UK, Jan 10, 2014).
Berg, S. (1999) The Sense of the Past. In Fraleigh, S. and Hanstein, P. (eds) Researching Dance: Evolving Modes of Enquiry. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsbugh Press.
Birkenhead, J. and Stevens, J. (2002) ‘The Performance Reflective Practice Project: Reflection & Professional Practice’. Paper presented at the Shared Visions Conference. (Brighton, UK, September 1-3, 2002).
Brown, S. (2010) ‘From VLEs to learning webs: the implications of Web 2.0 for learning and teaching’. Interactive Learning Environments, 18 (1): 1-10.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10494820802158983
Bullen, M., Morgan. T. and Qayyum, A. (2011) ‘Digital Learners in Higher Education: Generation is Not the Issue’. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 37 (1): 1-24.
Davis III, C. H. F., Deil-Amen, R., Rios-Aguilar, C. and Sacramento Gonzalez Canche, M. (2012) Social Media in Higher Education: A Literature Review and Research Directions. Report printed by the University of Arizona and Claremont Graduate University.
Finlayson, C. (2014) ‘Using focus groups to enhance student voice: a work-in-progress exploration of student learning experiences in large classes’. Enhancing the Learner Experience in Higher Education, 6 (1): 49-54. http://dx.doi.org/10.14234/elehe.v6i1.92
Freeman Herreid, C. and Schiller, N. (2013) ‘Case Studies and the Flipped Classroom’. Journal of College Science Teaching, 42 (5): 62-66.
Fry, H., Ketteridge, S. and Marshall, S. (2008) Understanding Student Learning. In Fry, H., Ketteridge, S. and Marshall, S. (eds) A Handbook for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education. London: Routledge.
Garrison, D. and Kaunka, H. (2004) ‘Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education’. Internet and Higher Education, 7 (2): 95-105.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.02.001
Helsper, E. J. and Enyon, R. (2010) ‘Digital natives: where is the evidence?’. British Educational Research Journal, 36 (3): 503-520.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01411920902989227
JISC. (2015) Use of VLEs with digital media. Available at: http://www.jiscdigitalmedia.ac.uk/guide/introduction-to-the-use-of-vles-with-digital-media (accessed 24/3/15).
Jones, C., Ramanau, R., Cross, S. and Healing, G. (2010) ‘Net generation or Digital Natives: Is there a distinct new generation entering university?’. Computers & Education, 54 (3): 722-732. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.022
Kirk, C. and Pitches, J. (2013) ‘Digital reflection: using digital technologies to enhance and embed creative processes’. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 22 (2): 213-230.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2013.768390
Kitzinger, J. (2005) Focus group research: using group dynamics to explore perceptions, experiences and understandings. In Holloway, I. (ed) Qualitative Research in Health Care. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Liamputtong, P. (2011) Focus Group Methodology London: Sage Publications Ltd.
Leijen, A., Admiraal, W., Wildschut, L. and Simons, R. (2008) ‘Students’ perspectives on e-learning and the use of a virtual learning environment in dance education’. Research in Dance Education, 9 (2): 147-162. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14647890802087951
McCulloch, A. (2009) ‘The student as co-producer: learning from public administration about the student-university relationship’. Studies in Higher Education, 34 (2): 171-183.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03075070802562857
O’Reilly, T. (2005) What is Web 2.0: Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. Available at: http://www.oreilly.com/pub/a/web2/archive/what-is-web-20.html (accessed 25/3/15).
Padlet (2015) Welcome to Padlet. Available at: https://padlet.com (accessed 24/3/15).
Sharpe, R., Benfield, G., Roberts, G and Francis, R. (2006) The undergraduate experience of blended e-learning: a review of UK literature and practice. Available at: https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/resources/detail/teachingandresearch/Undergraduate_Experience (accessed 19/8/15).
Türker, M.A. and Zingel, S. (2008) Formative Interfaces for Scaffolding Self-Regulated Learning in PLEs. elearningpapers. Available at: http://www.openeducationeuropa.eu/en/article/Formative-Interfaces-for-Scaffolding-Self-Regulated-Learning-in-PLEs (accessed 19/8/15).
Rowlands, I., Nicholas, D., Williams, P., Huntingdon, P., Fieldhouse, M., Gunter, B., Withey, R., Iamali, H. R., Dobrowolski, T. and Tenpoir, C. (2008) The Google generation: the information behaviour of the researcher of the future. Aslib Proceedings: New Information Perspectives, 60 (4): 290-310. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00012530810887953
Weller, M. (2006) VLE 2.0 and future directions in learning environments. Proceedings of the First International LAMS Conference 2006: Designing the Future of Learning Available at: http://lamsfoundation.org/lams2006/pdfs/Weller_Lams06.pdf (accessed 24/3/15).


DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14234/elehe.v7i1.95


The Journal Enhancing the Learner Experience in Higher Education can be found at: http://journals.northampton.ac.uk/index.php/elehe/index

Editorial Vol 7

http://journals.northampton.ac.uk/index.php/elehe/article/view/101/84

The Journal Enhancing the Learner Experience in Higher Education can be found at: http://journals.northampton.ac.uk/index.php/elehe/index

New edition of ELEHE out

Vol 7, No 1 (2015)

Table of Contents

Editorial

EditorialPDF
Alejandro Armellini1-2

Articles

Blended learning and postgraduate skills: rethinking MA HistoryPDF
Matthew McCormack, Natalie Hanley-Smith3-14
Social media platforms as educational interfaces - considering the way forward for blended learningPDF
Kelly Louise Preece15-28
Research into practice: evaluation of Skills Hub content and implications for library staff development in the creation of video OERsPDF
Jonas House, Georgina Dimmock29-45


ISSN: 2041-3122The Journal Enhancing the Learner Experience in Higher Education can be found at: http://journals.northampton.ac.uk/index.php/elehe/index

Friday, 12 December 2014

Book Review: International Students in the Asia Pacific – Mobility, Risks and Optimism (Peter Kell & Gillian Vogl, 2012)

International Students in the Asia Pacific – Mobility, Risks and Optimism (Peter Kell & Gillian Vogl, 2012)

Rashmi Dravid

Abstract


The book offers a comprehensive understanding of complex dynamics of factors that characterize international student mobility while unpacking the inherent contradictions.

Keywords


Internationalisation; student mobility; student experience

Full Text:

PDF

References


Beck, U. (2006) ‘Living in the World Risk Society.’ Economy and Society, 35 (3): 329-345. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03085140600844902
Kell, P. M. and Vogl, G. J. (2007) Internationalisation, national development and markets: Key dilemmas for leadership in higher education in Australia. In Kell, P. and Vogl, G. (eds) Between The Flags! From Local Dangers to Global Risks for International Students. International Students in the Asia Pacific. Springer.
Kell, P. and Vogl, G. (2012) International students in the Asia Pacific. Springer.
UNESCO/Council of Europe (2001) Code of Good Practice in the provision of Transnational Education. Available at http://www.coe.int/t/dg4/highereducation/recognition/code%20of%20good%20practice_EN.asp (accessed 6/12/14)
Vogl, G. and Kell, P. (2010) Welcome to Wollongong: host communities and international students. Macquarie University Research Online.


DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14234/elehe.v6i1.91



The Journal Enhancing the Learner Experience in Higher Education can be found at: http://journals.northampton.ac.uk/index.php/elehe/index

Using focus groups to enhance student voice: a work-in-progress exploration of student learning experiences in large classes

Using focus groups to enhance student voice: a work-in-progress exploration of student learning experiences in large classes

Caitlin C Finlayson

Abstract


While course evaluations are traditionally used to gauge teaching effectiveness and provide an outlet for student voice, this metric does not integrate students as collective partners in the teaching and learning process. In promoting a shared learning experience between teachers and students, this project uses a focus group approach to solicit student feedback and ideas, and disseminate the results to faculty. This paper explores the results of a qualitative pilot focus group study related to student engagement in large classes and demonstrates that a focus group approach is an effective and empowering way to prioritise student voice.

Keywords


Focus groups; student engagement; reflective teaching

Full Text:

PDF

References


Breen, R. L. (2006) ‘A practical guide to focus-group research’. Journal of Geography in Higher Education. 30 (3): 463–475.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03098260600927575
Fielding, M. (2001) ‘Beyond the rhetoric of student voice: New departures or new constraints in the transformation of 21st century schooling?’. Forum for Promoting 3-19 Comprehensive Education. 43 (2): 100-110. http://dx.doi.org/10.2304/forum.2001.43.2.1
Fitzgerald, R. and Corazzo, P. (2013) ‘Out of sight, out of mind: Capturing the distance (online) learner experience’. Enhancing the Learner Experience in Higher Education. 5 (1): 58–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.14234/elehe.v5i1.76
Fluckiger, J., Vigil, Y. T. Y., Pasco, R., and Danielson, K. (2010) ‘Formative feedback: Involving students as partners in assessment to enhance learning’. College Teaching. 58 (4): 136-140. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2010.484031
Giles, A., Martin, S. C., Bryce, D., and Hendry, G. D. (2004) ‘Students as partners in evaluation: Student and teacher perspectives’. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 29 (6): 681-685. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0260293042000227227
Hamilton, D. M., Pritchard, R. E., Welsh, C. N., Potter, G. C., and Saccucci, M. S. (2002) ‘The effects of using in-class focus groups on student course evaluations’. Journal of Education for Business. 77 (6): 329-333. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08832320209599684
Hendershott, A. and Wright, S. (1993) ‘Student focus groups and curricular review’. Teaching Sociology. 21 (2): 154–159.
Kramer, M. W. & Pier, P. M. (1997). ‘A holistic examination of students’ perceptions of effective and ineffective communication by college teachers’. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Communication Association. (83rd. Chicago, IL, November 19-23, 1997).
Little, B. and Williams, R. (2010) ‘Students’ roles in maintaining quality and in enhancing learning: Is there a tension?’ Quality in Higher Education. 16 (2): 115–127. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13538322.2010.485740
Marsh, H. W. (1984) ‘Students’ evaluations of university teaching: Dimensionality, reliability, validity, potential baises, and utility’. Journal of Educational Psychology. 76 (5): 707–754. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.76.5.707
Secor, A. J. (2010) Social surveys, interviews, and focus groups. In Gomez, B. and Jones III, J. P. (eds) Research Methods in Geography: A Critical Introduction. West Sussex: Blackwell Publishing, Ltd.
University of Mary Washington. 2010. ‘Mission Statement’. Available online: http://www.umw.edu/about/mission/ (accessed 1/8/14).
Wachtel, H. K. (1998) ‘Student evaluation of college teaching effectiveness: A brief review’. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 23 (2): 191. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0260293980230207
Williams, W. M. and Ceci, S. J. (1997) ‘“How’m I Doing?” Problems with student ratings of instructors and courses’. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning. 29 (5): 12–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00091389709602331


DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14234/elehe.v6i1.92

The Journal Enhancing the Learner Experience in Higher Education can be found at: http://journals.northampton.ac.uk/index.php/elehe/index