Wednesday, 4 December 2013

Doctoral Training Partnerships: review of postgraduate researcher experience

Doctoral Training Partnerships: a work-in-progress review of the postgraduate researcher experience

Rebekah Smith McGloin

Abstract


Recent changes in research council policy and postgraduate funding have seen the beginnings of a fundamental reconfiguration in how some PhD students are recruited and trained. This report is a work-in-progress review of early student evaluation data from a single doctoral training partnership (DTP) within this new doctoral training landscape. It gives a broad overview of historical and contemporary challenges in researcher development before summarising the results of evaluation data from the first year of the BBSRC DTP. It goes on to discuss how these preliminary findings might be followed up and what they might hint at in terms of the model’s potential to influence researcher development in the future.

Keywords


Researcher development; Student experience; Doctoral training

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bennett, P. and Turner, G. (2013) PRES 2013: Results from the Postgraduate Research Experience Survey. York: HEA. Available online: http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/assets/documents/postgraduate/PRES_2013_UK_report.pdf (accessed 15 November 2013).
CIHE (2010) Talent Fishing: What businesses want from postgraduates. London: CIHE. Available online: http://www.cihe.co.uk/talent-fishing-what-businesses-want-from-postgraduates (accessed 15 November 2013).
Edstrom, K. (2008) ‘Doing course evaluation as if learning matters most’. Higher Education Research and Development, 27 (2): 95–106. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07294360701805234
Gibney, E. (2013) ‘PhD System Risks Leaving Overseas Students out in the Cold’. Times Higher Education, 18 April 2013. Available online: http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/news/phd-system-risks-leaving-overseas-students-in-the-cold/2003277.article (accessed 15 November 2013).
HM Treasury (2002) SET for success: the supply of people with science, technology, engineering and mathematics skills. The report of Sir Gareth Roberts’ Review. London: HMT. Available online: http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/http:/www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/d/robertsreview_introch1.pdf (accessed 15 November 2013).
Park, C. (2007) Redefining the Doctorate. York: The Higher Education Academy. Available online: http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/assets/documents/research/redefining_the_doctorate.pdf (accessed 15 November 2013).
QAA (2004) Code of practice for the assurance of academic quality and standards in higher education. Section 1: Postgraduate research programmes. Gloucester: QAA. Available online: http://www.qaa.ac.uk/Publications/InformationAndGuidance/Pages/Code-of-practice-section-1.aspx (accessed 15 November 2013).
RCUK (2001) Joint Statement of the UK Research Councils' Training Requirements for Research Students. London: RCUK. Available online:
http://www.vitae.ac.uk/CMS/files/upload/RCUK-Joint-Skills-Statement-2001.pdf (accessed 15 November 2013).
RCUK (2005) Summary of Research Organisation Reporting on Career Development and Skills (Roberts) Payments 2005. London: RCUK. Available online: http://www.vitae.ac.uk/CMS/files/RCUK-Roberts-reporting-summary-2005.pdf (accessed 15 November 2013).
RCUK (2006) Career Development and Transferable Skills Training Payments: Summary of November 2006 Reporting. London: RCUK. Available online: http://www.vitae.ac.uk/CMS/files/RCUK-Roberts-reporting-summary-2006.pdf (accessed 15 November 2013).
RCUK (2007) Career Development and Transferable Skills Training Payments: Summary of 2007 Reporting. London: RCUK. Available online: http://www.vitae.ac.uk/CMS/files/RCUK-Roberts-reporting-summary-2007.pdf (accessed 15 November 2013).
RCUK (2008) Career Development and Transferable Skills Training Payments: Summary of 2008 Reporting. London: RCUK. Available online: http://www.vitae.ac.uk/CMS/files/upload/policy_forum_summary_of_2008_robert_%20reporting_jan2009.pdf (accessed 15 November 2013).
RCUK (2010) Review of progress in implementing the recommendations of Sir Gareth Roberts, regarding employability and career development of PhD students and research staff. London: RCUK. Available online: http://www.rcuk.ac.uk/documents/researchcareers/IndependentReviewHodge.pdf (accessed 15 November 2013).
Zabaleta, F. (2007) ‘The use and misuse of student evaluations of teaching’. Teaching in Higher Education, 12 (1):.55–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13562510601102131


DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14234/elehe.v5i1.70

The Journal Enhancing the Learner Experience in Higher Education can be found at: http://journals.northampton.ac.uk/index.php/elehe/index

1 comment:

  1. We Hold our Tutors to a Higher Standard, and Pay our Tutors More Fairly, than nearly any other Tutoring Company.Thus, we have Better (and more Experienced) Tutors.We accept only the top tutor applicants, and will never compromise our selectivity in order to artificially inflate our ranks. In addition, every member of the Team is required to have recently scored in the 95th percentile or above on any standardized test that he/she teaches.Math Tutor Austin, Math Tutor Atlanta, Math Tutor Houston, Math Tutor Seattle.
    Science Tutor Las Vegas | Math Tutor Hawaii | Math Tutor Las Vegas | Tutor for kids Las Vegas | Math Tutor Charlotte | Math Tutor Phoenix | Math Tutor Los Angeles | Math Tutor Boston | Math Tutor New York | Math Tutor Denver | Math Tutor Chicago |

    ReplyDelete